Skip to main content

HOW TO WRITE A SUMMARY PART 2

As was pointed out in How to Write a Summary Part 1 the summary question tests candidates on whether they have understood the passage or not. Summarising information indicates that the reader has a clear understanding of the key points raised by the writer. Candidates should take note of the following aspects as they write summaries.

Distractors are a major stumbling block when it comes to identify relevant points. Distractors are pieces of information which have the potential to mislead the reader/candidate into thinking that they also have to be included in the summary. Candidates who fail to discern properly end up including such information resulting in scoring low marks or failing. To avoid this mistake, candidates should analyse the summary question carefully before they start compiling their points.

Question analysis involves identifying key words and content words. Key words are instructional words or phrases. These words direct the candidate as to what exactly they should do as they respond to the question; they specify the task the candidate should do. Some examples are, describe, narrate, explain and summarise. It is important that candidates take note of the wording of the question so that they perform the task required by the question. Many a times candidates end up answering their own question instead of the one set in the question paper. For instance, if the question is asking the candidate to "write a summary describing..." and the candidate decides to explain, there is a high possibility that the candidate will leave out descriptive details, the very information required by the question.

Content words inform the candidates the kind of information to be included in the summary. For instance, a candidate may be required to summarise actions, thoughts, feelings or advantages. In some cases, the question can have only one content area. However, some questions can include several content areas for example, actions, reasons and feelings. To ensure that candidates are raising the required content, they should highlight the content word(s) before compiling points. They can do so by underlining or using asterisks or any other method which can help them to identify them accurately. One major mistake some candidates make is focusing on just one or some of the content areas completely ignoring the other areas required by the question. For instance, if the question is demanding that the candidate should summarise the actions and the feelings, the candidates should focus on both areas in order for them to gain all the marks.

It is important to note that in some cases, candidates are required to distill information. This means extracting information from wordy expressions and sentences. They can achieve this through paraphrasing. However, they should apply this technique sparingly, restricting it to situations which strictly require them to do so to avoid making grammatical errors and mistakes. This means that candidates can leave out some words or use their own words in order to reshape sentences contextually at the same time achieving grammatical accuracy as well as content relevance. Where points are stated explicitly, candidates are encouraged to maintain the same syntactic and grammatical structure of the original sentences.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2

Table of Contents An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2  Plot Overview The scene opens with the celebration of a wedding, with the couple seated on a mat as guests present gifts, share snuff, and ululate in joy.  The festive atmosphere is heightened by the rhythm of drums, and people compete to outdo each other in dancing. A remarkable unnamed young female dancer dominates the stage, leaving many young men too tired to keep up with her. Suddenly, the herdboy interrupts the merriment, rushing in to stop the drummers. He brings terrifying news of the arrival of Europeans, who he describes as "ghosts." Mushore, a staunch believer in traditions, interprets this as divine punishment for the lenient punishment given to Chikwete's son for committing bestiality. There's is a debate on how to respond, with Wedenga suggesting hiding from the Europeans while Zindonga and the herdboy refuse, considering it cowardice. Duri arrives to th...

ANALYSIS OF CHAPTER ONE OF THE NOVEL "THE TIES THAT BIND" BY PHILLIP KUNDENI CHIDAVAENZI

THE TIES THAT BIND CHAPTER 1 By Kosam Ndlovu The first chapter of the text The Ties That Bind is expository in nature. The major characters as well as the major themes are highlighted for further exploration in the subsequent chapters. Through the use of suspense and foreshadowing, the reader is kept spellbound by the fascinating multi-plotting presented in this introductory chapter. Told from the third person omniscient perspective, the reader has a panoramic view of the entire scope of the issues that are brought out physically and through the thinking processes of the characters. Jacqueline is portrayed as an individual with authority and confidence. The onomatopoeic   clanking sound of her shoes emphasises her self-assertive character with regards to her professionalism in conducting her duties as a law practitioner and her personality. The foregrounding of Jackie (Jacqueline) as a confident law practitioner, hints on her prudence and keen judgement of character which becom...

Why 'I Stand to Be Corrected' is Incorrect: Common Misunderstandings and What to Say Instead

 Introduction: Clearing Up A Common Phrase Ever heard someone say, " I stand to be corrected"? It's surprisingly common, but here's the kicker - it's actually wrong! People usually use it when they're unsure about something, trying to show they're open to correction. But, as you might have guessed, "I stand to be corrected"  is not the right way to say it. So, what's the deal with this phrase, and why do so many people get it wrong? Sources of Error One of the reasons this phrase trips people up is that it's often used by non-native speakers of English. Chances are, they've picked it up from others who didn't know it was incorrect in the first place. Since it's not found in standard English textbooks, this "error" keeps circulating, spreading like a linguistic urban legend. Why Many People Don't Realise the Mistake Why doesn't this phrase feel wrong when we hear it? Well, it's used by politicians, pu...