Skip to main content

HOW TO WRITE A SUMMARY PART 1

The summary question tests candidates' ability to select relevant information from the passage at the same time presenting it concisely and precisely within the stipulated word limit. In this part, I will focus on question analysis, key words, content words and responding to all the aspects of the question.

It is very important for the candidates to carefully analyse the summary question in order to unpack all its demands. More often than not, candidates perform badly on this question as a result of failure to understand the demands of the question.

Understanding the question entails several aspects including identifying the material to be summarised. The summary question always specifies the parameters of the material to be summarised and candidates must always stick to it otherwise they may spend precious time working on material which is irrelevant thus risking losing all the marks allocated for this question. Pay attention to the instruction, "Use material from paragraph.... to the end of..." or "... from line... to line ..... Such phrases direct the candidate to the sections of the passage where relevant points must be extracted from. As such, any information taken from elsewhere other than the indicated section of the passage is irrelevant. It is always a good idea to draw a line at the beginning  and another one at the end of the material in question.

Every summary question has key elements and candidates must identifying them; this is referred to as question analysis. It means breaking down the question into different parts to ensure correct interpretation of the question. Two of the key question elements are: the key word and the content word.

The key word gives specific instructions to the candidate regarding the task to be performed. It is in the form of a command word such as "summarise," or "describe". Indeed, key words are not limited to writing summaries, they are also used in other types of questions and in other subject areas. A typical examination question might read: "Write a summary describing..."   or "Summarise the..." In these two examples, the words "summarise" and "describing" are key words; they instruct the student to summarise and to describe. If, for example, the candidate decides to discuss or to list in answering the above questions, the candidate would have demonstrated failure to understand the demands of the question.

The candidate should also identify the content word or phrase. The content word or phrase spells out the information the candidate should compile in the summary. Not all questions ask for the same information (content) and therefore it is imperative that candidates read the question carefully, noting the particular content the question is asking them to look for from the passage. Typical examination questions might read: "Summarise the actions ...." or " Summarise the feelings ...." In these two questions, the content words are "actions" and "feelings." Accordingly, as candidates are looking for points from the passage, they should look for information about the actions or the feelings; any other information which has nothing to do with these two ideas is irrelevant and candidates must not include it in their summary.

Some summary questions have more than one content word or phrase, also known as question aspects. Unwary candidates tend to focus on one aspect only and ignore the other aspects. Consider the typical examination question: "Summarise the thoughts and the feelings...." Clearly, the question has two limbs-the thoughts and the feelings and as such, candidates should look for points about both.

In How to Write a Summary part 2, I will focus on how to identify relevant points from the passage, distilling information and identifying the correct agent. The aspect of language will also be expounded on because no matter how relevant the points are, if the language used to express them is poor, a candidate cannot score maximum marks. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves: Act 1, Scene 1 Zimsec Literature Notes

Table of Contents The Tribe of Graves: Act 1, Scene 1 Introduction Are you studying  The Tribe of Graves   for the  ZIMSEC  A Level Literature  exam or another exam? This guide is designed to help you understand the key elements of the play such as the plot, characters, themes and dramatic techniques. The guide aims to deepen your understanding of the play and bolster your literary skills for the exam. Plot overview The scene is set in pre-colonial Zimbabwe, before the arrival of the whites, the play opens with the King of the Rozvi people and his wife, Vahosi, in their bedroom. The King is restless, tossing and sweating in his sleep. Vahosi is concerned and asks him about his troubled sleep. The king reveals that he had had disturbing "enigma" but did not wake her up. He then reveals his dream. In the dream, his late father, his grandfather and some men were building a hut which was soon attacked by termites. Despite the advice to sto...

An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2

Table of Contents An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2  Plot Overview The scene opens with the celebration of a wedding, with the couple seated on a mat as guests present gifts, share snuff, and ululate in joy.  The festive atmosphere is heightened by the rhythm of drums, and people compete to outdo each other in dancing. A remarkable unnamed young female dancer dominates the stage, leaving many young men too tired to keep up with her. Suddenly, the herdboy interrupts the merriment, rushing in to stop the drummers. He brings terrifying news of the arrival of Europeans, who he describes as "ghosts." Mushore, a staunch believer in traditions, interprets this as divine punishment for the lenient punishment given to Chikwete's son for committing bestiality. There's is a debate on how to respond, with Wedenga suggesting hiding from the Europeans while Zindonga and the herdboy refuse, considering it cowardice. Duri arrives to th...

Why 'I Stand to Be Corrected' is Incorrect: Common Misunderstandings and What to Say Instead

 Introduction: Clearing Up A Common Phrase Ever heard someone say, " I stand to be corrected"? It's surprisingly common, but here's the kicker - it's actually wrong! People usually use it when they're unsure about something, trying to show they're open to correction. But, as you might have guessed, "I stand to be corrected"  is not the right way to say it. So, what's the deal with this phrase, and why do so many people get it wrong? Sources of Error One of the reasons this phrase trips people up is that it's often used by non-native speakers of English. Chances are, they've picked it up from others who didn't know it was incorrect in the first place. Since it's not found in standard English textbooks, this "error" keeps circulating, spreading like a linguistic urban legend. Why Many People Don't Realise the Mistake Why doesn't this phrase feel wrong when we hear it? Well, it's used by politicians, pu...