Skip to main content

ALL PROTOCOLS OBSERVED

Table of Contents

    Introduction

    The beginning of a speech is more than just a formality—it is the moment when the speaker establishes a connection with the audience. A good introduction sets the tone, sparks interest, and signals that the rest of the speech is worth listening to. Much like an appetiser before a hearty meal, if the introduction fails, the audience may assume the rest of the speech will be equally disappointing. This is why every speaker should craft their opening with care, ensuring it is both engaging and respectful.

    One phrase that has become common in many formal gatherings is “all protocols observed.” But does this expression truly serve its purpose? Let’s explore its effectiveness—and the alternatives speakers can use to start well.

    The Problem with “All Protocols Observed”

    The phrase “all protocols observed” is widely used in political rallies, churches, funerals, and school ceremonies. However, it is not standard English, and repetition does not make it correct. While it may appear to save time by lumping together different groups of people, it has some major shortcomings.

    1. Avoiding Tediousness and Impersonality

    Far from being efficient, the phrase has become a cliché. It sounds detached, robotic, and impersonal. Listeners may feel unacknowledged, as though the speaker is rushing past the important courtesy of greeting. A warm greeting, on the other hand, makes people feel recognised and valued. A "good afternoon esteemed ladies and gentlemen" is better than "all protocols observed."

    2. Being Inclusive of Everyone

    The real task is to observe protocol properly—acknowledging people in order of importance, starting with the highest authority and working down. This shows respect and makes each group feel included. For example:

    “The Guest of Honour, the Head Teacher, teachers, and fellow students—good morning.”

    However, long lists can consume valuable speaking time. So what should a speaker do in large gatherings?

    Addressing Different Audiences

    The best approach is to group people appropriately rather than naming everyone individually. This ensures inclusion without being tedious. For example:

    • At a school function: “The Principal, teachers, and students—good morning.”

    • At a government function: “The Honourable Minister, deputy ministers, and distinguished guests.”

    Generic but standard expressions like “ladies and gentlemen” or “boys and girls” can also be used to capture the wider audience respectfully. The key is balance: enough recognition to show dignity, but concise enough to keep the speech engaging.

    The Importance of Conciseness

    Time is always limited, and so is the audience’s attention span. A good speaker should capture attention early, making listeners eager to hear more. Being concise in the introduction avoids boring the audience and allows more time for the main message. Remember, the introduction is not the speech itself—it is the door to the speech. Keep it clear, respectful, and engaging.

    Conclusion

    How you start a speech determines how your audience receives the rest of your message. While phrases like “all protocols observed” may seem convenient, they are impersonal and non-standard. Instead, group your audience respectfully, acknowledge the highest authority, and use inclusive, dignified expressions. A strong introduction is concise, warm, and audience-centered—an appetiser that whets the appetite for the main meal of your speech.



    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2

    Table of Contents An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2  Plot Overview The scene opens with the celebration of a wedding, with the couple seated on a mat as guests present gifts, share snuff, and ululate in joy.  The festive atmosphere is heightened by the rhythm of drums, and people compete to outdo each other in dancing. A remarkable unnamed young female dancer dominates the stage, leaving many young men too tired to keep up with her. Suddenly, the herdboy interrupts the merriment, rushing in to stop the drummers. He brings terrifying news of the arrival of Europeans, who he describes as "ghosts." Mushore, a staunch believer in traditions, interprets this as divine punishment for the lenient punishment given to Chikwete's son for committing bestiality. There's is a debate on how to respond, with Wedenga suggesting hiding from the Europeans while Zindonga and the herdboy refuse, considering it cowardice. Duri arrives to th...

    ANALYSIS OF CHAPTER ONE OF THE NOVEL "THE TIES THAT BIND" BY PHILLIP KUNDENI CHIDAVAENZI

    THE TIES THAT BIND CHAPTER 1 By Kosam Ndlovu The first chapter of the text The Ties That Bind is expository in nature. The major characters as well as the major themes are highlighted for further exploration in the subsequent chapters. Through the use of suspense and foreshadowing, the reader is kept spellbound by the fascinating multi-plotting presented in this introductory chapter. Told from the third person omniscient perspective, the reader has a panoramic view of the entire scope of the issues that are brought out physically and through the thinking processes of the characters. Jacqueline is portrayed as an individual with authority and confidence. The onomatopoeic   clanking sound of her shoes emphasises her self-assertive character with regards to her professionalism in conducting her duties as a law practitioner and her personality. The foregrounding of Jackie (Jacqueline) as a confident law practitioner, hints on her prudence and keen judgement of character which becom...

    Why 'I Stand to Be Corrected' is Incorrect: Common Misunderstandings and What to Say Instead

     Introduction: Clearing Up A Common Phrase Ever heard someone say, " I stand to be corrected"? It's surprisingly common, but here's the kicker - it's actually wrong! People usually use it when they're unsure about something, trying to show they're open to correction. But, as you might have guessed, "I stand to be corrected"  is not the right way to say it. So, what's the deal with this phrase, and why do so many people get it wrong? Sources of Error One of the reasons this phrase trips people up is that it's often used by non-native speakers of English. Chances are, they've picked it up from others who didn't know it was incorrect in the first place. Since it's not found in standard English textbooks, this "error" keeps circulating, spreading like a linguistic urban legend. Why Many People Don't Realise the Mistake Why doesn't this phrase feel wrong when we hear it? Well, it's used by politicians, pu...