Skip to main content

Character Analysis: A Quick Guide

Table of Contents

    How to Analyse Characters

    Analysing characters involves examining how they are portrayed through their actions, words, thoughts, descriptions and what other characters say about them. In your analysis, you should use evidence from the text and apply appropriate adjectives to describe their traits. While adjectives may look simple, they are powerful tools used for summarising character traits. 

    Characters' Actions

    Focus on the characters' actions. What characters do will help you to understand their traits. For example, in the story Shadows on the Wall, the child narrator deliberately chooses not to listen to his father. This action indicates defiance, making "defiant" an appropriate adjective for the narrator. In, The Crow, two boys pursue the crow with intent to kill it. This action shows cruelty and bloodthirstiness. Therefore, you should say the boys are "cruel" and "bloodthirsty." Do not just mention what a character does; use suitable adjectives to summarise their traits. 

    What Characters Say

    You should also look at what the characters say because their words can reveal  their hidden traits. For example, in The Hero, when Julius  tells his classmates "there's nothing to tell," after being expelled from school, his words show insincerity and secrecy. He hides the truth, so adjectives like "insincere" and "secretive" appropriately describe his character.

    What is Said by By Other Characters

    Pay attention to what characters say about each other. This can help you to gain insight not only into the character being discussed but also into the one making the comments.  In The Hero the administrators label Julius as "Julius The Little." This comment indicates that the administrators are "abusive" and "hostile."

    Author's Description

    The author can use descriptive language to create vivid impressions of characters. This includes their appearance, manner of dressing or speaking. For example in Tomorrow's People, Ndiweni's uses disparaging language such as inxaha and dog to refer to Nimrod. This semantic field indicates that he is disrespectful and rude. Texts rarely gives obvious statements about the character traits. Readers should do a thorough character analysis in order for them to arrive at the plausible conclusions and use appropriate adjectives to summarise the traits.

    Characters' Thoughts 

    Sometimes characters don't perform any notable actions but express their thoughts. Authors are able to bring out the thoughts of characters through a variety of ways including the stream of consciousness, monologues or  third-person omniscient narration. These techniques can give readers insight into the characters' thoughts. From these thoughts, readers can derive character traits and then apply the right adjectives to describe them. 

    Characterisation vs. Character Analysis

    Characterisation, also known as character development, refers to the techniques employed by the author to create characters. These techniques  include description, speech, actions, thoughts, feelings, e.t.c. Characterisation is closely tied to the themes because the way characters are created, reflects the issues the author intends to explore. On the other hand, character analysis is what the reader does in order to interpret the traits of the characters based on the evidence provided by the author. Always touch on the

    themes when analysing characters. For instance,  to conclude that a character is "bloodthirsty", you should connect this analysis to the theme of violence or death. 

    Tip: 

    Never analyse a single literary element in isolation. All literary elements are interwoven. If a question asks about a specific element, focus on it while acknowledging how other elements amplify it. 

    For a complete guide on how to analyse literary elements, feel free to reach out through through the contact details provided on the "Contact Us page".


    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves: Act 1, Scene 1 Zimsec Literature Notes

    Table of Contents The Tribe of Graves: Act 1, Scene 1 Introduction Are you studying  The Tribe of Graves   for the  ZIMSEC  A Level Literature  exam or another exam? This guide is designed to help you understand the key elements of the play such as the plot, characters, themes and dramatic techniques. The guide aims to deepen your understanding of the play and bolster your literary skills for the exam. Plot overview The scene is set in pre-colonial Zimbabwe, before the arrival of the whites, the play opens with the King of the Rozvi people and his wife, Vahosi, in their bedroom. The King is restless, tossing and sweating in his sleep. Vahosi is concerned and asks him about his troubled sleep. The king reveals that he had had disturbing "enigma" but did not wake her up. He then reveals his dream. In the dream, his late father, his grandfather and some men were building a hut which was soon attacked by termites. Despite the advice to sto...

    An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2

    Table of Contents An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2  Plot Overview The scene opens with the celebration of a wedding, with the couple seated on a mat as guests present gifts, share snuff, and ululate in joy.  The festive atmosphere is heightened by the rhythm of drums, and people compete to outdo each other in dancing. A remarkable unnamed young female dancer dominates the stage, leaving many young men too tired to keep up with her. Suddenly, the herdboy interrupts the merriment, rushing in to stop the drummers. He brings terrifying news of the arrival of Europeans, who he describes as "ghosts." Mushore, a staunch believer in traditions, interprets this as divine punishment for the lenient punishment given to Chikwete's son for committing bestiality. There's is a debate on how to respond, with Wedenga suggesting hiding from the Europeans while Zindonga and the herdboy refuse, considering it cowardice. Duri arrives to th...

    Why 'I Stand to Be Corrected' is Incorrect: Common Misunderstandings and What to Say Instead

     Introduction: Clearing Up A Common Phrase Ever heard someone say, " I stand to be corrected"? It's surprisingly common, but here's the kicker - it's actually wrong! People usually use it when they're unsure about something, trying to show they're open to correction. But, as you might have guessed, "I stand to be corrected"  is not the right way to say it. So, what's the deal with this phrase, and why do so many people get it wrong? Sources of Error One of the reasons this phrase trips people up is that it's often used by non-native speakers of English. Chances are, they've picked it up from others who didn't know it was incorrect in the first place. Since it's not found in standard English textbooks, this "error" keeps circulating, spreading like a linguistic urban legend. Why Many People Don't Realise the Mistake Why doesn't this phrase feel wrong when we hear it? Well, it's used by politicians, pu...