Skip to main content

An Analysis of Tomorrow's People By Raisedon Baya: Scene 6

Table of Contents

    An Analysis of Tomorrow's People By Raisedon Baya: Scene 6

    Plot overview 

    The scene introduces Bomba, a ruling party official meeting with Father to discuss Nimrod and Yakhani's relationship. Bomba is concerned about this relationship because Yakhani is a member of the opposition party, which he views as a threat. Father expresses his disapproval, stating that he has already "asked him to stop immediately." Their brief interaction ends with both men chanting ruling party slogans, showcasing their loyalty to their political party. However, the atmosphere shifts dramatically when Ndiweni bursts into Father's house unannounced, "brandishing his knobkerrie," and angrily objects to Nimrod and Yakhani's relationship. The tension escalates, but the scene abruptly ends when Miss Jubane interrupts, ordering the students to stop improvising the drama and return to performing  Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. 

    Setting

    The scene juxtaposes Ndweni's modest house and Father's luxurious home.  Father's house, reflecting his status as a ruling party chairperson, poised to "be an MP or appointed governor," exhibits signs of wealth and opulence, while Ndiweni's home highlights his humble status. This contrast underscores the social inequality and injustice perpetuated under the governance of the ruling party, resulting from the abuse of power, particularly in instances where key positions as being a governor are filled by appointed individuals without the consent of the populace. The wealth disparity between the two households indicate the larger sphere of political and social disparity within post-independence Zimbabwe. 

    Themes

    Education suppression

    Miss Jubane's arrival symbolises the oppressive education system which stiffles creativity and innovation. Her interruption of the students' performance reflects the rigidity of the system where teachers dictate what students should learn, leaving no room for student input or critical engagement.  

    Patriarchy

    Patriarchal tendencies are evident in the scene as male characters dominate the discussion about the relationships. Men like Bomba and Father, act as gatekeepers of political ideologies and societal order, reflecting how political power and dominance are tightly connected to control over family and societal structures. They manipulate societal norms to maintain their authority and repress opposition.

    Political Polarisation

    Political polarisation is another central theme explored in this scene. The disdain shown toward Yakhani and Nimrod's relationship highlights a society unwilling to embrace unity between different political and ethnic groups. Bomba refers to the opposition as "enemies," and Ndiweni uses a derogatory term to refer to Nimrod, calling him "inxaha," an improperly castrated male animal. The dehumanising language underscores the tribalism and bigotry that continue to divide society. Bomba also worries that Yakhan's connection to Nimrod will compromise party security, implying that she might act as a spy.

    Fear of pregnancy

    The motif fear of pregnancy continues in the play as Bomba raises a question about whether Nimrod "is going to keep his thing zipped up in his trousers." This innuendo refers to sexual intercourse and its potential outcome, pregnancy and childbirth. Retrogressive characters like Father and Bomba fear the emergence of a new generation of people that embraces social cohesion and harmony despite ethnic and cultural differences. 

    Rebellion 

    Rebellion is symbolised by the forbidden relationship between Nimrod and Yakhani. Though they don't appear directly in the scene, their defiance represents hope for a future where the Ndebele and Shona people can unite, defying the oppressive structures of the present. 

    Characters

    The name "Bomba" is derived from the word, bomb, symbolising destruction and violence. This matches with his aggressive nature reflected by his use of words like "fire" and 'burn." Bomba's belligerent nature stems from his fear that Nimrod and Yakhani's relationship will undermine party stability, hinting at both political and ethnic prejudices. 

    Father

    Father is portrayed as a violent figure who shares Bomba's political and ethnic prejudices. He even goes so far as to threaten to shoot Yakhani if she continues her relationship with Nimrod, demonstrating his willingness to use violence to maintain social order and party loyalty.

    Ndiweni

    Ndiweni embodies the stereotype and tribalism that dominates the society. He refers to Nimrod as a "dog" and "inxaha," revealing his inability to see people as individuals, instead categorising them based on their ethnic origins or political affiliations. His anger and threats of violence highlights his deep-seated intolerance and hostility.

    Teacher

    Teacher, Miss Jubane, represents the repressive nature of the education system. She abruptly stops the students' improvised performance, fearing that it might get her "fired or arrested." Her fear stems from living in an authoritarian society that censors creativity and dissent. Although she is a teacher, a position that gives her the opportunity to foster learning, she compromises her values to preserve her livelihood. Her hasty judgement and refusal to watch the entire play before making a decision highlights her lack of academic rigour and critical thinking.

    Dalubuhle

    Dalubuhle is portrayed as a bold and defiant character. He directly contradicts Miss Jubane, insisting that they "can't stop now" acting their play. His repetition of the word "unfair" reflects the frustrations of students under the oppressive education system where students are trapped and sniffled. 

    Miles

    In this scene, Miles continues to play his rebellious role by declaring, "we are not going back to Shakespeare." This line symbolises his refusal to conform to outdated traditions and his determination to fight for progress towards true cultural identity. 

    Techniques

    Use of Ndebele and Shona

    Ndiweni and Father switch to Ndebele and Shona respectively in their heated exchange. Father, caught off guard by Ndiweni's sudden entrance, asks, "Ko zwaita sei?"( what has happened) This shifts in language emphasise their intense emotions of anger and highlights their strong connection to their cultural identity. Ndiweni swears by his late father (ngiyafunga ngobaba olele ezintabeni oh!") that he will "put an axe into" Nimrod's head the moment he sees him with his daughter. This strong language points to his intense anger and his fierce protectiveness rooted in ethnic and political stereotypes. By allowing the actors to switch to their native languages, Baya illustrates his quest for a harmonious society where both the Ndebele and the Shona can engage meaningfully, despite their differences.

    Props

    The bottle of whiskey and glasses used by Bomba and Father symbolise party loyalty and the extravagant lifestyle of ruling party members. However, this symbolism is ironic, as it also represents the harmful ideologies they embrace, such as authoritarianism, political intolerance and societal control. The alcohol is emblematic of the "drunkenness" of those blinded by ethnic and political stereotypes, which further divide the community. 

    Symbolism 

    Romantic relationship

    The romantic relationship of Yakhani and Bomba symbolises the potential for unity and harmony between the Ndebele and Shona people. However, retrogressive characters like Father and Ndiweni see it as a threat. They perceive it as a danger to their political agenda. For them, a polarised society is a solid foundation upon which they anchor the pillars of the ruling political party.

    Tone

    The tone shifts dramatically thought the scene. It opens with a friendly, but, accusatory tone as Bomba and Father enjoy drinks discussing Nimrod's relationship with Yakhani. Bomba holds Father responsible for raising his son "in party ways" and experts him to correct Nimrod's political mistake. However, the tone becomes tense and confrontational when Ndiweni storms into the house, wielding his knobkerrie, reflecting the volatility and deep-rooted hostility that underpins the scene.

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves: Act 1, Scene 1 Zimsec Literature Notes

    Table of Contents The Tribe of Graves: Act 1, Scene 1 Introduction Are you studying  The Tribe of Graves   for the  ZIMSEC  A Level Literature  exam or another exam? This guide is designed to help you understand the key elements of the play such as the plot, characters, themes and dramatic techniques. The guide aims to deepen your understanding of the play and bolster your literary skills for the exam. Plot overview The scene is set in pre-colonial Zimbabwe, before the arrival of the whites, the play opens with the King of the Rozvi people and his wife, Vahosi, in their bedroom. The King is restless, tossing and sweating in his sleep. Vahosi is concerned and asks him about his troubled sleep. The king reveals that he had had disturbing "enigma" but did not wake her up. He then reveals his dream. In the dream, his late father, his grandfather and some men were building a hut which was soon attacked by termites. Despite the advice to sto...

    An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2

    Table of Contents An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2  Plot Overview The scene opens with the celebration of a wedding, with the couple seated on a mat as guests present gifts, share snuff, and ululate in joy.  The festive atmosphere is heightened by the rhythm of drums, and people compete to outdo each other in dancing. A remarkable unnamed young female dancer dominates the stage, leaving many young men too tired to keep up with her. Suddenly, the herdboy interrupts the merriment, rushing in to stop the drummers. He brings terrifying news of the arrival of Europeans, who he describes as "ghosts." Mushore, a staunch believer in traditions, interprets this as divine punishment for the lenient punishment given to Chikwete's son for committing bestiality. There's is a debate on how to respond, with Wedenga suggesting hiding from the Europeans while Zindonga and the herdboy refuse, considering it cowardice. Duri arrives to th...

    Why 'I Stand to Be Corrected' is Incorrect: Common Misunderstandings and What to Say Instead

     Introduction: Clearing Up A Common Phrase Ever heard someone say, " I stand to be corrected"? It's surprisingly common, but here's the kicker - it's actually wrong! People usually use it when they're unsure about something, trying to show they're open to correction. But, as you might have guessed, "I stand to be corrected"  is not the right way to say it. So, what's the deal with this phrase, and why do so many people get it wrong? Sources of Error One of the reasons this phrase trips people up is that it's often used by non-native speakers of English. Chances are, they've picked it up from others who didn't know it was incorrect in the first place. Since it's not found in standard English textbooks, this "error" keeps circulating, spreading like a linguistic urban legend. Why Many People Don't Realise the Mistake Why doesn't this phrase feel wrong when we hear it? Well, it's used by politicians, pu...