Skip to main content

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

 Question: Compare and contrast The Lift and The Accident.

Answer:

The stories, The Lift and The Accident are set in colonial-era Rhodesia, and they provide insights into the complex social dynamics and racial tensions of the time. These settings play a significant role in shaping the narratives

 In both stories, there is a clear exploration of racial tensions between African and European populations. The Accident highlights the indifference and apathy of many European and African bystanders towards an accident involving a European driver and an African victim, In The Lift, the guard's actions and the differential treatment of African job seekers compared to . European individuals underscore the racial discrimination and inequality of the colonial society.

 Both stories touch on social injustice. In The Accident, there's a focus on the injustices experienced by the African population due to colonial rule. These include biased justice system. In The Lift, the harsh realities of urban life, joblessness, and poverty are depicted, underscoring the challenges faced by African job seekers.

 The authors in both stories employ vivid character descriptions. In The Accident, the European driver's physical appearance, the victim's injuries, and the appearance of onlookers are meticulously described. This serves to evoke feelings of contempt and sympathy respectively. In The Lift, the stories delve into the appearances and characteristics of the two young Black men, particularly emphasising their emaciated bodies to highlight the suffering of the Africans during the colonial era in Rhodesia

Both stories are also similar in the sense that the characters do not have proper names. The characters in both stories are just described. This indicates that the stories . are representatives of societal strata, not just individuals. The unnamed European man in The Accident represents the privileged whites while the unnamed boys in The Lift represent the blacks during the Rhodesia era.

 However, the stories differ in several aspects. The Accident employs a more detached and observational narrative style. It focuses on the actions and reactions of various characters without diving deeply into their inner thoughts. In contrast, The Lift provides access to the nner thoughts and emotions of the characters, particularly the two young men who are always occupied with the thoughts about their next meal

 On the one hand, The Accident revolves around a single, dramatic incident-an accident. It focuses on the immediate reactions of those present at the scene. On the other hand, The Lift presents the ongoing struggles of African job seekers, offering a more extended exploration of their challenges and experiences.

 While The Accident uses strong visual symbols like the European driver's appearance and the injured man's condition to evoke empathy and highlight social injustice, in The Lift, there is less reliance on graphic imagery but more on the representation of the urban setting, bureaucratic control, and the division between rural and urban life.

 In The Accident, the central event involves an accident where interaction, albeit minimal, between the European driver and the African victim occurs. In The Lift, interaction is minimal, as the guard largely prevents interaction between . the African job seekers and the European individuals in the building, highlighting segregation and social exclusion

In conclusion, the comparison of The Lift and The Accident sheds light on the pervasive racial tensions and social injustices in colonial-era Rhodesia. Both narratives, while differing in narrative style and focus, effectively convey the stark disparities between African and European populations. The Accident emphasises a singular, dramatic incident to evoke empathy, using visual symbols, while The Lift provides a more extended exploration of the ongoing struggles faced by African job seekers.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Well spelt out. Keep it up
Cosmopolitan said…
I am glad you found it helpful. Thank you for visiting my blog. Stay tuned for more content.

Popular posts from this blog

An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves: Act 1, Scene 1 Zimsec Literature Notes

Table of Contents The Tribe of Graves: Act 1, Scene 1 Introduction Are you studying  The Tribe of Graves   for the  ZIMSEC  A Level Literature  exam or another exam? This guide is designed to help you understand the key elements of the play such as the plot, characters, themes and dramatic techniques. The guide aims to deepen your understanding of the play and bolster your literary skills for the exam. Plot overview The scene is set in pre-colonial Zimbabwe, before the arrival of the whites, the play opens with the King of the Rozvi people and his wife, Vahosi, in their bedroom. The King is restless, tossing and sweating in his sleep. Vahosi is concerned and asks him about his troubled sleep. The king reveals that he had had disturbing "enigma" but did not wake her up. He then reveals his dream. In the dream, his late father, his grandfather and some men were building a hut which was soon attacked by termites. Despite the advice to sto...

An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2

Table of Contents An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2  Plot Overview The scene opens with the celebration of a wedding, with the couple seated on a mat as guests present gifts, share snuff, and ululate in joy.  The festive atmosphere is heightened by the rhythm of drums, and people compete to outdo each other in dancing. A remarkable unnamed young female dancer dominates the stage, leaving many young men too tired to keep up with her. Suddenly, the herdboy interrupts the merriment, rushing in to stop the drummers. He brings terrifying news of the arrival of Europeans, who he describes as "ghosts." Mushore, a staunch believer in traditions, interprets this as divine punishment for the lenient punishment given to Chikwete's son for committing bestiality. There's is a debate on how to respond, with Wedenga suggesting hiding from the Europeans while Zindonga and the herdboy refuse, considering it cowardice. Duri arrives to th...

Why 'I Stand to Be Corrected' is Incorrect: Common Misunderstandings and What to Say Instead

 Introduction: Clearing Up A Common Phrase Ever heard someone say, " I stand to be corrected"? It's surprisingly common, but here's the kicker - it's actually wrong! People usually use it when they're unsure about something, trying to show they're open to correction. But, as you might have guessed, "I stand to be corrected"  is not the right way to say it. So, what's the deal with this phrase, and why do so many people get it wrong? Sources of Error One of the reasons this phrase trips people up is that it's often used by non-native speakers of English. Chances are, they've picked it up from others who didn't know it was incorrect in the first place. Since it's not found in standard English textbooks, this "error" keeps circulating, spreading like a linguistic urban legend. Why Many People Don't Realise the Mistake Why doesn't this phrase feel wrong when we hear it? Well, it's used by politicians, pu...