Skip to main content

ANALYSIS OF THE CHARACTER OF TAJEER IN THE PLAY A HOLE IN THE SKY, BY AUSTINE BUKENYA

Tajeer is presented as a subject of ridicule, thanks to his role in the play A HOLE INTHE SKY.  As a dynamic character, the audience is left with ambivalent feelings after watching the play. His ill-health doesn't generate pity since to many members of the audience, it comes as a payback for his evil deeds meted out to the poor villagers. It is his change of character towards the end of the play which makes the audience sympathise with him.

By sending his men to evict Kibichi's family, Tajeer emerges as an inconsiderate character. He completely turns a deaf ear to the plea of the villagers as they request to be left alone in their ancestral land. Tajeer's greed blinds him to see the desperation that is likely to be experienced by the villagers if they are removed from their native land. For example, he erects a building directly on the stream thus blocking it completely. The villagers who reside downstream fail to obtain water as the stream is the only source of water in the vicinity. He also belittles glaring instances of environmental degradation and labels them as "accidents." His insatiable desire for wealth motivates him to trample upon the villager's freedoms and liberties. In his mind, profit generation reigns supreme and is ranked higher than the welfare of his fellow human beings.

Cutting corners is Tajeer's modus operandi. This kind of behaviour compels the audience to classifiy him as an unscrupulous business man. He demonstrates his dishonesty vividly when he indicates that he will send the National Environmental Management Agency "the things they want to hear." This shows that he is a cunning character who is bent on obtaining profits through hook or crook. During one of the business meetings with his partners, he suggests that they should use deceitful language in their correspondences with the government authorities so that they get the land for their jatropha plantation. Tajeer is an opportunist. He capitalises on the incompetence and corruption of the government officials.

Tajeer is a gormandiser. His gluttony accentuates his comic behaviour. He eats huge amounts of food and declares that food is "the only real joy in life". The dramatist portrays him as a caricature as he is shown consuming enormous amounts of food yet he deludes himself into thinking that he eats little food. To support himself, he says "breakfasting on the side of a goat, lunching on one leg of beef and dining on a single chicken surely is not overeating." Kikongwe politely excuses himself upon seeing a trolley loaded with various dishes being wheeled into the room thinking that the food is for everyone in the house. Hatibu explains that all the food is for Tajeer. His colossal body size reflects his gargantuan appetite and greed. Thus Tajeer's grotesque lifestyle adds to his caricatural attribute.

As a foil to his son Hatibu who is meek and calm, Tajeer is a belligerant and violent character. He employs violence as a mechanism for solving conflicts. When he is approached by Kijani and Kitavi, his ego is thoroughly injured. He feels that has been belittled severely during the conversation and he quickly looks for an object to hit Kibichi's children. This shows that he is insecure. He also displays his insecurity during a meeting with his partners when Hatibu indicates that they had had and encounter with the Kibichi family. Because he is a secretive person, Tajeer gets angry with Hatibu for revealing his conflict with the Kibichi family to the foreign investors.

By disrespecting the villagers, Tajeer comes across to the audience as a haughty and contemptuous character. He refers to the members of Kibichi's family as "bush rats" and "good-for- nothings." Although his aim is to embarrass Kibichi's family, Tajeer's disparaging register says more about his lack of manners than it diminishes Kibichi's family. He is seen as a character without the ability to control his temper, thus making him a social misfit.

Tajeer is stuck in the archaic oppressive social systems. He rejects the notion of rights based approach  to development. He does not believe that humans and animals have rights hence it is easy for him to destroy the habitat of both humans and animals. It is mainly for this reason that the playwright presents him as a ridiculous character. Bukenya vents his abhorrence towards Tajeer. This indicates his condemnation of the human activities that destroy environment. 

In a sudden twist of events, Tajeer changes dramatically after his "miraculous" healing. Kikongwe plays a pivotal role in Tajeer's life by treating him of his fatal tumours. His tumours are symbolic. They symbolise people who have similar thoughts as himself. Bukenya presents people who destroy environment as carcinogenic because they cause death, not only of animals but also of humans. Tajeer eventually becomes an ambassador of environment. He praises Kikongwe for his prudence and honours him publicly. This gives the play a sense of hope and optimism.
  


Comments

Anonymous said…
Great novel
Unknown said…
great notes you got here
Anonymous said…
What impressions of kitavi and kijani do you get
Anonymous said…
thank you, these notes are really helpful

Popular posts from this blog

An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves: Act 1, Scene 1 Zimsec Literature Notes

Table of Contents The Tribe of Graves: Act 1, Scene 1 Introduction Are you studying  The Tribe of Graves   for the  ZIMSEC  A Level Literature  exam or another exam? This guide is designed to help you understand the key elements of the play such as the plot, characters, themes and dramatic techniques. The guide aims to deepen your understanding of the play and bolster your literary skills for the exam. Plot overview The scene is set in pre-colonial Zimbabwe, before the arrival of the whites, the play opens with the King of the Rozvi people and his wife, Vahosi, in their bedroom. The King is restless, tossing and sweating in his sleep. Vahosi is concerned and asks him about his troubled sleep. The king reveals that he had had disturbing "enigma" but did not wake her up. He then reveals his dream. In the dream, his late father, his grandfather and some men were building a hut which was soon attacked by termites. Despite the advice to sto...

An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2

Table of Contents An Analysis of The Tribe of Graves By Basil Diki: Act 1 Scene 2  Plot Overview The scene opens with the celebration of a wedding, with the couple seated on a mat as guests present gifts, share snuff, and ululate in joy.  The festive atmosphere is heightened by the rhythm of drums, and people compete to outdo each other in dancing. A remarkable unnamed young female dancer dominates the stage, leaving many young men too tired to keep up with her. Suddenly, the herdboy interrupts the merriment, rushing in to stop the drummers. He brings terrifying news of the arrival of Europeans, who he describes as "ghosts." Mushore, a staunch believer in traditions, interprets this as divine punishment for the lenient punishment given to Chikwete's son for committing bestiality. There's is a debate on how to respond, with Wedenga suggesting hiding from the Europeans while Zindonga and the herdboy refuse, considering it cowardice. Duri arrives to th...

Why 'I Stand to Be Corrected' is Incorrect: Common Misunderstandings and What to Say Instead

 Introduction: Clearing Up A Common Phrase Ever heard someone say, " I stand to be corrected"? It's surprisingly common, but here's the kicker - it's actually wrong! People usually use it when they're unsure about something, trying to show they're open to correction. But, as you might have guessed, "I stand to be corrected"  is not the right way to say it. So, what's the deal with this phrase, and why do so many people get it wrong? Sources of Error One of the reasons this phrase trips people up is that it's often used by non-native speakers of English. Chances are, they've picked it up from others who didn't know it was incorrect in the first place. Since it's not found in standard English textbooks, this "error" keeps circulating, spreading like a linguistic urban legend. Why Many People Don't Realise the Mistake Why doesn't this phrase feel wrong when we hear it? Well, it's used by politicians, pu...